Skip to main content

Conversational AI Playbook

 Roadmap for Conversational AI


Owing to the technological development and changes in the customer

behaviour, e-commerce has developed over different levels of maturity in

recent years. The challenge for companies is to recognise relevant technological and market trends and assess them accordingly. 


Companies are currently facing the challenge of achieving the next level

of maturity—so-called Conversational Commerce. This level of maturity

seems desirable at present because current trends could revolutionise the

sales sector. This means that those who proceed slowly with the implementation of Conversational Commerce could lose customers to competitors. On

the other hand, companies could, for example, benefit from public attention

by incorporating bots at an early stage (Fig. 4.8).

Thereby, the leap to Conversational Commerce does not represent a gradual, but a fundamental advancement of e-commerce. This is not only about

another voice-controlled touch point. It is much rather about a new ecosystem which automatically initiates and coordinates ordering processes driven

by customers and situations. Intelligent assistants either follow the instructions of consumers or recognise the need to take action by themselves, e.g.

reordering of detergents or travel booking according to the appointments

diary.

However, it is also decisive that the transition to Conversational

Commerce is well thought out and planned. One possibility to do this sys-

tematically is the DM3 model presented in Part II AI Business: Framework

and Maturity Model

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Machine Learning

 The term machine learning (ML) as a part of artificial intelligence is ubiq- uitous nowadays. The term is used for a wide number of various appli- cations and methods that deal with the “generation of knowledge from experience”. The well-known US computer scientist Tom Mitchell defines machine learning as follows: A computer program is said to learn from experience E with respect to some class of tasks T and performance measure P, if its performance at tasks in T, as measured by P, improves with experience E (Mitchell 1997). An illustrative example of this would be a chess computer program that improves its performance (P) in playing chess (the task T) by experience (E), by playing as many games as possible (even against itself ) and analysing them (Mitchell 1997). Machine learning is not a fundamentally new approach for machines to generate “knowledge” from experience. Machine learning technology was used to filter out junk e-mails a long time ago. Whilst spam filters that tack- ...

Possible Limitations of AI-Based Bots

 The examples above already show the present-day potential of AI-based bots. At present, these systems are still in an early stage and still have certain limitations and potentials for optimisation. Twitter Bot Tay by Microsoft Most bots at present are reactive service bots. Engagement bots that actively interact with the users as market and brand ambassadors go one step further. The most famous example here is the chatbot Tay by Microsoft. Microsoft removed Tay from the web apologetically within one day. The example shows that the uncontrolled training of bots by the community can lead to fatal consequences. AI systems still have to learn ethical standards. It thus becomes apparent that even bots require a kind of guideline. Like a journalist has to observe editorial guidelines, bots have to observe certain standards. The next generation of AI-based bots must control and create the possible room for communication. IBM Watson has been able to celebrate quite a few respectable resul...

Why Use Machine Learning?

Consider how you would write a spam filter using traditional programming techniques (Figure 1-1): 1. First you would look at what spam typically looks like. You might notice that some words or phrases (such as “4U,” “credit card,” “free,” and “amazing”) tend to come up a lot in the subject. Perhaps you would also notice a few other patterns in the sender’s name, the email’s body, and so on. 2. You would write a detection algorithm for each of the patterns that you noticed, and your program would flag emails as spam if a number of these patterns are detected. 3. You would test your program, and repeat steps 1 and 2 until it is good enough. Since the problem is not trivial, your program will likely become a long list of com‐ plex rules—pretty hard to maintain. In contrast, a spam filter based on Machine Learning techniques automatically learns which words and phrases are good predictors of spam by detecting unusually fre‐ quent patterns of words in the spam examples compared to the ham e...