Skip to main content

Robot Journalism Is Becoming Creative

 Algorithms are able to automatically search the Web for information, pool it

and create a readable piece of writing. In addition, data-based reports in the

area of sport, the weather or finances are already frequently created automat-

ically today.

Recently, for example, merely a few minutes after Apple had announced

their latest quarterly figures, there was a report by the news agency

Associated Press (AP): “Apple tops Street 1Q forecasts”. The financial report

deals solely with the mere financial figures, without any human assistance

whatsoever. Yet, AP was able to publish their report entirely via AI in line

with the AP guidelines. For this purpose, AP launched their corresponding

platform Wordsmith at the beginning of 2016, which automatically creates

more than 3000 of such financial reports every quarter, and which are pub-

lished fast and accurately. It is no longer that easy to distinguish between

whether an algorithm or a human has written a text.

Another exception of recent times is represented by the IBM invention

called “Watson”: After its victory in the quiz show “Jeopardy”, Watson

showed what is already possible with AI in the field of robot journalism. As

the editor-in-chief, Watson created an entire edition of the British marketing

magazine “The Drum”. Thousands of copies of the edition were printed, in

which he had both selected images, adapted texts and designed the pages.

Creative AI that—as was to be shown in the test—works excellently.

To this end, he was fed with data about the winners of the “Golden Lion”

from the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity. It was not only

about creating the magazine, but at the same time, about creating AI that

suited the taste of the lifestyle public. Watson was thus meant to create

something that many brands have not succeeded in doing to this day: Place

the stakeholders in the spotlight and align the content marketing activities

with their interests and needs.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Possible Limitations of AI-Based Bots

 The examples above already show the present-day potential of AI-based bots. At present, these systems are still in an early stage and still have certain limitations and potentials for optimisation. Twitter Bot Tay by Microsoft Most bots at present are reactive service bots. Engagement bots that actively interact with the users as market and brand ambassadors go one step further. The most famous example here is the chatbot Tay by Microsoft. Microsoft removed Tay from the web apologetically within one day. The example shows that the uncontrolled training of bots by the community can lead to fatal consequences. AI systems still have to learn ethical standards. It thus becomes apparent that even bots require a kind of guideline. Like a journalist has to observe editorial guidelines, bots have to observe certain standards. The next generation of AI-based bots must control and create the possible room for communication. IBM Watson has been able to celebrate quite a few respectable resul...

Why Use Machine Learning?

Consider how you would write a spam filter using traditional programming techniques (Figure 1-1): 1. First you would look at what spam typically looks like. You might notice that some words or phrases (such as “4U,” “credit card,” “free,” and “amazing”) tend to come up a lot in the subject. Perhaps you would also notice a few other patterns in the sender’s name, the email’s body, and so on. 2. You would write a detection algorithm for each of the patterns that you noticed, and your program would flag emails as spam if a number of these patterns are detected. 3. You would test your program, and repeat steps 1 and 2 until it is good enough. Since the problem is not trivial, your program will likely become a long list of com‐ plex rules—pretty hard to maintain. In contrast, a spam filter based on Machine Learning techniques automatically learns which words and phrases are good predictors of spam by detecting unusually fre‐ quent patterns of words in the spam examples compared to the ham e...