Skip to main content

The Bot Revolution Has Announced Itself

 There has been a huge hype about chat bots since 2016. Every content

officer should take it very seriously. These bots can have a radical effect on

content marketing. If we were to receive all contents via an interface like

Facebook Messenger, WeChat or Telegram that was previously only available

via browsers, newsletters and apps, a thrilling alternative for content distribution would be formed. After all, bots can provide us with relevant information in the right context in the future. Ideally, we will receive less and

better information this way and thus avert the content shock.

Most bots are simply answering machines that are similar to a living FAQ

list or a newsletter. Only a few of them count among the league of AI. If we

ask a bot a closed question, we will first receive a simple answer without any

surprises. In most cases, bots cannot respond to spontaneous human behaviour and open questions. Instead, we receive a counter question along the

lines of: “I don’t know what you mean by that”. Bots are far from human

empathy. In most cases, they only give pre-worded answers on the basis

of a database in which all possible responses are listed. This is the reason

why bots try to direct us in a predefined direction that they can understand again. Unexpected courses of conversation lead to the end of them.

Furthermore, the AI-less bots can only respond to standard questions, do

not remember and do not really learn anything new.



Yet, that is not meant to beguile of the innovations expected in the future.

In combination with AI, bots become powerful tools and self-learning systems that understand our questions better in the course of time and thus

give us the right answers, because they understand our context. Virtual

assistants that have comprehensive access to our personal data are able to give good answers because of this database, which saves us having to search

and sort out knowledge. This is where the actual bot revolution, which is

announcing itself with gentle steps with the simplest of functionalities, lies.

Many brands are already preparing themselves for this development.

The bot revolution is changing the way and means of how brands obtain

access to potential customers via their supply of content. By 2027, this

development will have great consequences for the marketing and communication world and will radically change previous communication models.

Conventional models that rely on one brand message for all will function

less frequently.

Content strategists will have to develop a certain feeling for the fine

changes in the communication and content mix so that their organisation

can react in good time to the changes in the digital continuum. After all,

they do also want to reach their target groups with the brand messages in the

future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Possible Limitations of AI-Based Bots

 The examples above already show the present-day potential of AI-based bots. At present, these systems are still in an early stage and still have certain limitations and potentials for optimisation. Twitter Bot Tay by Microsoft Most bots at present are reactive service bots. Engagement bots that actively interact with the users as market and brand ambassadors go one step further. The most famous example here is the chatbot Tay by Microsoft. Microsoft removed Tay from the web apologetically within one day. The example shows that the uncontrolled training of bots by the community can lead to fatal consequences. AI systems still have to learn ethical standards. It thus becomes apparent that even bots require a kind of guideline. Like a journalist has to observe editorial guidelines, bots have to observe certain standards. The next generation of AI-based bots must control and create the possible room for communication. IBM Watson has been able to celebrate quite a few respectable resul...

What is Machine Learning

 The term machine learning (ML) as a part of artificial intelligence is ubiq- uitous nowadays. The term is used for a wide number of various appli- cations and methods that deal with the “generation of knowledge from experience”. The well-known US computer scientist Tom Mitchell defines machine learning as follows: A computer program is said to learn from experience E with respect to some class of tasks T and performance measure P, if its performance at tasks in T, as measured by P, improves with experience E (Mitchell 1997). An illustrative example of this would be a chess computer program that improves its performance (P) in playing chess (the task T) by experience (E), by playing as many games as possible (even against itself ) and analysing them (Mitchell 1997). Machine learning is not a fundamentally new approach for machines to generate “knowledge” from experience. Machine learning technology was used to filter out junk e-mails a long time ago. Whilst spam filters that tack- ...

What is Data Protection and Data Integrity

 As a matter of principle, when it comes to data protection, a differentiation must be made between personal data and data involving companies. As soon as inferences can be made to a specific individual and single data levels are being worked at, a moment has to be taken to consider: What is being processed? Is there already a business relationship? Which permissions or legal consent elements are at hand? Customer data may not be collected without permission and may also not be resold. Anybody who acts carelessly here can quickly render themselves liable to prosecution. In principle, the following applies however: Almost anything is possible with the customer’s consent. This is the reason why Facebook can act with the data to such an extent, because consent has been given, even if only few users have probably fully read and understood the Terms of Use. Likewise, a relatively far-reaching data processing in the scope of an ongoing customer relationship under the motto “for our own p...